Legal submissions begin in appeal over DPP retirement age ruling

Legal submissions began in the Appeal Court today in relation to the Constitutional Court’s ruling on the retirement age of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).

The Attorney General is seeking to overturn the Constitutional Court’s decision which resulted in King’s Counsel Paula Llewellyn stepping aside as DPP.

King’s Counsel Allan Wood, who is representing the Attorney General argued today that there was no constitutional infringement when the constitution was amended last year by a majority decision in parliament to extend the retirement age of the Auditor General and the DPP from  60 to 65.

The Attorney General is seeking clarification from the Appeal Court in relation to issues raised since the Constitutional Court handed down its ruling in April.

The court had struck down an amendment which gave Ms. Llewellyn the power to elect to remain on the job until age 65.

The Constitutional Court ruled that such an amendment was unlawful.

People’s National Party members Phillip Paulwell and Peter Bunting had challenged the amendment to the constitution.

Their attorneys said the Constitutional Court’s ruling meant that Ms. Llewellyn should leave office immediately.

Minister of Justice Delroy Chuck and Attorney General Derrick McKoy disagreed saying the court made no such order.

Ms. Llewellyn stepped aside from her post shortly after the ruling.

An acting DPP was appointed.

Ms. Llewellyn who reached the retirement age of 60 in September 2020 was given a three-year extension on the job.

Justices Jennifer Straw, Vivienne Harris and Kissock Laing will continue to hear legal submissions in the matter tomorrow.

Read More

Cabinet to know results of investigations in deaths of newborn and elderly woman at public health facilities

Legal submissions began in the Appeal Court today in relation to the Constitutional Court’s ruling on the retirement age of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).

The Attorney General is seeking to overturn the Constitutional Court’s decision which resulted in King’s Counsel Paula Llewellyn stepping aside as DPP.

King’s Counsel Allan Wood, who is representing the Attorney General argued today that there was no constitutional infringement when the constitution was amended last year by a majority decision in parliament to extend the retirement age of the Auditor General and the DPP from  60 to 65.

The Attorney General is seeking clarification from the Appeal Court in relation to issues raised since the Constitutional Court handed down its ruling in April.

The court had struck down an amendment which gave Ms. Llewellyn the power to elect to remain on the job until age 65.

The Constitutional Court ruled that such an amendment was unlawful.

People’s National Party members Phillip Paulwell and Peter Bunting had challenged the amendment to the constitution.

Their attorneys said the Constitutional Court’s ruling meant that Ms. Llewellyn should leave office immediately.

Minister of Justice Delroy Chuck and Attorney General Derrick McKoy disagreed saying the court made no such order.

Ms. Llewellyn stepped aside from her post shortly after the ruling.

An acting DPP was appointed.

Ms. Llewellyn who reached the retirement age of 60 in September 2020 was given a three-year extension on the job.

Justices Jennifer Straw, Vivienne Harris and Kissock Laing will continue to hear legal submissions in the matter tomorrow.

Read More

PNP calls on agriculture minister to address soft yam disease crisis

Legal submissions began in the Appeal Court today in relation to the Constitutional Court’s ruling on the retirement age of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).

The Attorney General is seeking to overturn the Constitutional Court’s decision which resulted in King’s Counsel Paula Llewellyn stepping aside as DPP.

King’s Counsel Allan Wood, who is representing the Attorney General argued today that there was no constitutional infringement when the constitution was amended last year by a majority decision in parliament to extend the retirement age of the Auditor General and the DPP from  60 to 65.

The Attorney General is seeking clarification from the Appeal Court in relation to issues raised since the Constitutional Court handed down its ruling in April.

The court had struck down an amendment which gave Ms. Llewellyn the power to elect to remain on the job until age 65.

The Constitutional Court ruled that such an amendment was unlawful.

People’s National Party members Phillip Paulwell and Peter Bunting had challenged the amendment to the constitution.

Their attorneys said the Constitutional Court’s ruling meant that Ms. Llewellyn should leave office immediately.

Minister of Justice Delroy Chuck and Attorney General Derrick McKoy disagreed saying the court made no such order.

Ms. Llewellyn stepped aside from her post shortly after the ruling.

An acting DPP was appointed.

Ms. Llewellyn who reached the retirement age of 60 in September 2020 was given a three-year extension on the job.

Justices Jennifer Straw, Vivienne Harris and Kissock Laing will continue to hear legal submissions in the matter tomorrow.

Read More

Over 500 students granted special accommodations during PEP Exams

Legal submissions began in the Appeal Court today in relation to the Constitutional Court’s ruling on the retirement age of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).

The Attorney General is seeking to overturn the Constitutional Court’s decision which resulted in King’s Counsel Paula Llewellyn stepping aside as DPP.

King’s Counsel Allan Wood, who is representing the Attorney General argued today that there was no constitutional infringement when the constitution was amended last year by a majority decision in parliament to extend the retirement age of the Auditor General and the DPP from  60 to 65.

The Attorney General is seeking clarification from the Appeal Court in relation to issues raised since the Constitutional Court handed down its ruling in April.

The court had struck down an amendment which gave Ms. Llewellyn the power to elect to remain on the job until age 65.

The Constitutional Court ruled that such an amendment was unlawful.

People’s National Party members Phillip Paulwell and Peter Bunting had challenged the amendment to the constitution.

Their attorneys said the Constitutional Court’s ruling meant that Ms. Llewellyn should leave office immediately.

Minister of Justice Delroy Chuck and Attorney General Derrick McKoy disagreed saying the court made no such order.

Ms. Llewellyn stepped aside from her post shortly after the ruling.

An acting DPP was appointed.

Ms. Llewellyn who reached the retirement age of 60 in September 2020 was given a three-year extension on the job.

Justices Jennifer Straw, Vivienne Harris and Kissock Laing will continue to hear legal submissions in the matter tomorrow.

Read More

74 Y/O man suspected to have committed suicide in St. Mary

Legal submissions began in the Appeal Court today in relation to the Constitutional Court’s ruling on the retirement age of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).

The Attorney General is seeking to overturn the Constitutional Court’s decision which resulted in King’s Counsel Paula Llewellyn stepping aside as DPP.

King’s Counsel Allan Wood, who is representing the Attorney General argued today that there was no constitutional infringement when the constitution was amended last year by a majority decision in parliament to extend the retirement age of the Auditor General and the DPP from  60 to 65.

The Attorney General is seeking clarification from the Appeal Court in relation to issues raised since the Constitutional Court handed down its ruling in April.

The court had struck down an amendment which gave Ms. Llewellyn the power to elect to remain on the job until age 65.

The Constitutional Court ruled that such an amendment was unlawful.

People’s National Party members Phillip Paulwell and Peter Bunting had challenged the amendment to the constitution.

Their attorneys said the Constitutional Court’s ruling meant that Ms. Llewellyn should leave office immediately.

Minister of Justice Delroy Chuck and Attorney General Derrick McKoy disagreed saying the court made no such order.

Ms. Llewellyn stepped aside from her post shortly after the ruling.

An acting DPP was appointed.

Ms. Llewellyn who reached the retirement age of 60 in September 2020 was given a three-year extension on the job.

Justices Jennifer Straw, Vivienne Harris and Kissock Laing will continue to hear legal submissions in the matter tomorrow.

Read More

Gov’t seeking to implement measures to deal with adults who display bad behavior at schools

Legal submissions began in the Appeal Court today in relation to the Constitutional Court’s ruling on the retirement age of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).

The Attorney General is seeking to overturn the Constitutional Court’s decision which resulted in King’s Counsel Paula Llewellyn stepping aside as DPP.

King’s Counsel Allan Wood, who is representing the Attorney General argued today that there was no constitutional infringement when the constitution was amended last year by a majority decision in parliament to extend the retirement age of the Auditor General and the DPP from  60 to 65.

The Attorney General is seeking clarification from the Appeal Court in relation to issues raised since the Constitutional Court handed down its ruling in April.

The court had struck down an amendment which gave Ms. Llewellyn the power to elect to remain on the job until age 65.

The Constitutional Court ruled that such an amendment was unlawful.

People’s National Party members Phillip Paulwell and Peter Bunting had challenged the amendment to the constitution.

Their attorneys said the Constitutional Court’s ruling meant that Ms. Llewellyn should leave office immediately.

Minister of Justice Delroy Chuck and Attorney General Derrick McKoy disagreed saying the court made no such order.

Ms. Llewellyn stepped aside from her post shortly after the ruling.

An acting DPP was appointed.

Ms. Llewellyn who reached the retirement age of 60 in September 2020 was given a three-year extension on the job.

Justices Jennifer Straw, Vivienne Harris and Kissock Laing will continue to hear legal submissions in the matter tomorrow.

Read More

Bank Teller killed in 4 vehicle collision in Duncans, Trelawny

Legal submissions began in the Appeal Court today in relation to the Constitutional Court’s ruling on the retirement age of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).

The Attorney General is seeking to overturn the Constitutional Court’s decision which resulted in King’s Counsel Paula Llewellyn stepping aside as DPP.

King’s Counsel Allan Wood, who is representing the Attorney General argued today that there was no constitutional infringement when the constitution was amended last year by a majority decision in parliament to extend the retirement age of the Auditor General and the DPP from  60 to 65.

The Attorney General is seeking clarification from the Appeal Court in relation to issues raised since the Constitutional Court handed down its ruling in April.

The court had struck down an amendment which gave Ms. Llewellyn the power to elect to remain on the job until age 65.

The Constitutional Court ruled that such an amendment was unlawful.

People’s National Party members Phillip Paulwell and Peter Bunting had challenged the amendment to the constitution.

Their attorneys said the Constitutional Court’s ruling meant that Ms. Llewellyn should leave office immediately.

Minister of Justice Delroy Chuck and Attorney General Derrick McKoy disagreed saying the court made no such order.

Ms. Llewellyn stepped aside from her post shortly after the ruling.

An acting DPP was appointed.

Ms. Llewellyn who reached the retirement age of 60 in September 2020 was given a three-year extension on the job.

Justices Jennifer Straw, Vivienne Harris and Kissock Laing will continue to hear legal submissions in the matter tomorrow.

Read More

Foreign Affairs Minister welcomes policy to protect undocumented spouses of U.S. citizens from deportation

Legal submissions began in the Appeal Court today in relation to the Constitutional Court’s ruling on the retirement age of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).

The Attorney General is seeking to overturn the Constitutional Court’s decision which resulted in King’s Counsel Paula Llewellyn stepping aside as DPP.

King’s Counsel Allan Wood, who is representing the Attorney General argued today that there was no constitutional infringement when the constitution was amended last year by a majority decision in parliament to extend the retirement age of the Auditor General and the DPP from  60 to 65.

The Attorney General is seeking clarification from the Appeal Court in relation to issues raised since the Constitutional Court handed down its ruling in April.

The court had struck down an amendment which gave Ms. Llewellyn the power to elect to remain on the job until age 65.

The Constitutional Court ruled that such an amendment was unlawful.

People’s National Party members Phillip Paulwell and Peter Bunting had challenged the amendment to the constitution.

Their attorneys said the Constitutional Court’s ruling meant that Ms. Llewellyn should leave office immediately.

Minister of Justice Delroy Chuck and Attorney General Derrick McKoy disagreed saying the court made no such order.

Ms. Llewellyn stepped aside from her post shortly after the ruling.

An acting DPP was appointed.

Ms. Llewellyn who reached the retirement age of 60 in September 2020 was given a three-year extension on the job.

Justices Jennifer Straw, Vivienne Harris and Kissock Laing will continue to hear legal submissions in the matter tomorrow.

Read More

Policeman killed in Manchester

Legal submissions began in the Appeal Court today in relation to the Constitutional Court’s ruling on the retirement age of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).

The Attorney General is seeking to overturn the Constitutional Court’s decision which resulted in King’s Counsel Paula Llewellyn stepping aside as DPP.

King’s Counsel Allan Wood, who is representing the Attorney General argued today that there was no constitutional infringement when the constitution was amended last year by a majority decision in parliament to extend the retirement age of the Auditor General and the DPP from  60 to 65.

The Attorney General is seeking clarification from the Appeal Court in relation to issues raised since the Constitutional Court handed down its ruling in April.

The court had struck down an amendment which gave Ms. Llewellyn the power to elect to remain on the job until age 65.

The Constitutional Court ruled that such an amendment was unlawful.

People’s National Party members Phillip Paulwell and Peter Bunting had challenged the amendment to the constitution.

Their attorneys said the Constitutional Court’s ruling meant that Ms. Llewellyn should leave office immediately.

Minister of Justice Delroy Chuck and Attorney General Derrick McKoy disagreed saying the court made no such order.

Ms. Llewellyn stepped aside from her post shortly after the ruling.

An acting DPP was appointed.

Ms. Llewellyn who reached the retirement age of 60 in September 2020 was given a three-year extension on the job.

Justices Jennifer Straw, Vivienne Harris and Kissock Laing will continue to hear legal submissions in the matter tomorrow.

Read More

Earthquake unit confirms that sections of Jamaica were rattled by a 4.3 magnitude quake yesterday

Legal submissions began in the Appeal Court today in relation to the Constitutional Court’s ruling on the retirement age of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).

The Attorney General is seeking to overturn the Constitutional Court’s decision which resulted in King’s Counsel Paula Llewellyn stepping aside as DPP.

King’s Counsel Allan Wood, who is representing the Attorney General argued today that there was no constitutional infringement when the constitution was amended last year by a majority decision in parliament to extend the retirement age of the Auditor General and the DPP from  60 to 65.

The Attorney General is seeking clarification from the Appeal Court in relation to issues raised since the Constitutional Court handed down its ruling in April.

The court had struck down an amendment which gave Ms. Llewellyn the power to elect to remain on the job until age 65.

The Constitutional Court ruled that such an amendment was unlawful.

People’s National Party members Phillip Paulwell and Peter Bunting had challenged the amendment to the constitution.

Their attorneys said the Constitutional Court’s ruling meant that Ms. Llewellyn should leave office immediately.

Minister of Justice Delroy Chuck and Attorney General Derrick McKoy disagreed saying the court made no such order.

Ms. Llewellyn stepped aside from her post shortly after the ruling.

An acting DPP was appointed.

Ms. Llewellyn who reached the retirement age of 60 in September 2020 was given a three-year extension on the job.

Justices Jennifer Straw, Vivienne Harris and Kissock Laing will continue to hear legal submissions in the matter tomorrow.

Read More