Supreme Court asked to consider granting PM Holness leave for judicial review of IC report about his statutory declarations

The Supreme Court has been asked to consider granting Prime Minister Andrew Holness leave for judicial review of a report from the Integrity Commission in relation to his statutory declarations.

The suit was filed on Monday by law firm Henlin Gibson Henlin, which represents the Prime Minister.

Mr. Holness is seeking to quash the Integrity Commission’s report, which contains the investigation, findings, and recommendations about his statutory declarations.

That report was tabled in Parliament last month.

The applicants are the Prime Minister, as well as companies with which he is affiliated: Imperium Holdings Limited, Positive Media Solutions Limited, and Positive Jamaica Foundation Limited.

Respondents are the Integrity Commission, as well as directors Craig Beresford and Kevin Stephenson.

In the suit, Mr. Holness outlined that he is seeking to quash the report on the basis that it is an abuse of the power and discretion conferred on the respondents under the Integrity Commission Act and the Corruption Prevention Act.

Mr. Holness is also seeking an order compelling the respondents to examine the 2022 and 2023 statutory declarations as provided by the Integrity Commission Act.

The Prime Minister also wants a declaration that the submission of the Commission’s report to Parliament for tabling was unlawful and/or illegal, having regard to the full terms of Section 54 of the Integrity Commission Act.

Mr. Holness is seeking damages for stigma, negligent investigation and breach of privacy.

He is also seeking aggravated and vindicatory damages.

Read More

Opposition MPs walk out of Parliament after Golding’s attempt to file no-confidence motion against PM Holness fails

The Supreme Court has been asked to consider granting Prime Minister Andrew Holness leave for judicial review of a report from the Integrity Commission in relation to his statutory declarations.

The suit was filed on Monday by law firm Henlin Gibson Henlin, which represents the Prime Minister.

Mr. Holness is seeking to quash the Integrity Commission’s report, which contains the investigation, findings, and recommendations about his statutory declarations.

That report was tabled in Parliament last month.

The applicants are the Prime Minister, as well as companies with which he is affiliated: Imperium Holdings Limited, Positive Media Solutions Limited, and Positive Jamaica Foundation Limited.

Respondents are the Integrity Commission, as well as directors Craig Beresford and Kevin Stephenson.

In the suit, Mr. Holness outlined that he is seeking to quash the report on the basis that it is an abuse of the power and discretion conferred on the respondents under the Integrity Commission Act and the Corruption Prevention Act.

Mr. Holness is also seeking an order compelling the respondents to examine the 2022 and 2023 statutory declarations as provided by the Integrity Commission Act.

The Prime Minister also wants a declaration that the submission of the Commission’s report to Parliament for tabling was unlawful and/or illegal, having regard to the full terms of Section 54 of the Integrity Commission Act.

Mr. Holness is seeking damages for stigma, negligent investigation and breach of privacy.

He is also seeking aggravated and vindicatory damages.

Read More

Education Ministry addressing issue which resulted in some teachers not getting September salaries

The Supreme Court has been asked to consider granting Prime Minister Andrew Holness leave for judicial review of a report from the Integrity Commission in relation to his statutory declarations.

The suit was filed on Monday by law firm Henlin Gibson Henlin, which represents the Prime Minister.

Mr. Holness is seeking to quash the Integrity Commission’s report, which contains the investigation, findings, and recommendations about his statutory declarations.

That report was tabled in Parliament last month.

The applicants are the Prime Minister, as well as companies with which he is affiliated: Imperium Holdings Limited, Positive Media Solutions Limited, and Positive Jamaica Foundation Limited.

Respondents are the Integrity Commission, as well as directors Craig Beresford and Kevin Stephenson.

In the suit, Mr. Holness outlined that he is seeking to quash the report on the basis that it is an abuse of the power and discretion conferred on the respondents under the Integrity Commission Act and the Corruption Prevention Act.

Mr. Holness is also seeking an order compelling the respondents to examine the 2022 and 2023 statutory declarations as provided by the Integrity Commission Act.

The Prime Minister also wants a declaration that the submission of the Commission’s report to Parliament for tabling was unlawful and/or illegal, having regard to the full terms of Section 54 of the Integrity Commission Act.

Mr. Holness is seeking damages for stigma, negligent investigation and breach of privacy.

He is also seeking aggravated and vindicatory damages.

Read More

Samuda pledges to work for all constituents regardless of party affiliation

The Supreme Court has been asked to consider granting Prime Minister Andrew Holness leave for judicial review of a report from the Integrity Commission in relation to his statutory declarations.

The suit was filed on Monday by law firm Henlin Gibson Henlin, which represents the Prime Minister.

Mr. Holness is seeking to quash the Integrity Commission’s report, which contains the investigation, findings, and recommendations about his statutory declarations.

That report was tabled in Parliament last month.

The applicants are the Prime Minister, as well as companies with which he is affiliated: Imperium Holdings Limited, Positive Media Solutions Limited, and Positive Jamaica Foundation Limited.

Respondents are the Integrity Commission, as well as directors Craig Beresford and Kevin Stephenson.

In the suit, Mr. Holness outlined that he is seeking to quash the report on the basis that it is an abuse of the power and discretion conferred on the respondents under the Integrity Commission Act and the Corruption Prevention Act.

Mr. Holness is also seeking an order compelling the respondents to examine the 2022 and 2023 statutory declarations as provided by the Integrity Commission Act.

The Prime Minister also wants a declaration that the submission of the Commission’s report to Parliament for tabling was unlawful and/or illegal, having regard to the full terms of Section 54 of the Integrity Commission Act.

Mr. Holness is seeking damages for stigma, negligent investigation and breach of privacy.

He is also seeking aggravated and vindicatory damages.

Read More

Final ballot count for St Ann North East by-election to begin today

The Supreme Court has been asked to consider granting Prime Minister Andrew Holness leave for judicial review of a report from the Integrity Commission in relation to his statutory declarations.

The suit was filed on Monday by law firm Henlin Gibson Henlin, which represents the Prime Minister.

Mr. Holness is seeking to quash the Integrity Commission’s report, which contains the investigation, findings, and recommendations about his statutory declarations.

That report was tabled in Parliament last month.

The applicants are the Prime Minister, as well as companies with which he is affiliated: Imperium Holdings Limited, Positive Media Solutions Limited, and Positive Jamaica Foundation Limited.

Respondents are the Integrity Commission, as well as directors Craig Beresford and Kevin Stephenson.

In the suit, Mr. Holness outlined that he is seeking to quash the report on the basis that it is an abuse of the power and discretion conferred on the respondents under the Integrity Commission Act and the Corruption Prevention Act.

Mr. Holness is also seeking an order compelling the respondents to examine the 2022 and 2023 statutory declarations as provided by the Integrity Commission Act.

The Prime Minister also wants a declaration that the submission of the Commission’s report to Parliament for tabling was unlawful and/or illegal, having regard to the full terms of Section 54 of the Integrity Commission Act.

Mr. Holness is seeking damages for stigma, negligent investigation and breach of privacy.

He is also seeking aggravated and vindicatory damages.

Read More

Samuda wins North East St Ann by-election

The Supreme Court has been asked to consider granting Prime Minister Andrew Holness leave for judicial review of a report from the Integrity Commission in relation to his statutory declarations.

The suit was filed on Monday by law firm Henlin Gibson Henlin, which represents the Prime Minister.

Mr. Holness is seeking to quash the Integrity Commission’s report, which contains the investigation, findings, and recommendations about his statutory declarations.

That report was tabled in Parliament last month.

The applicants are the Prime Minister, as well as companies with which he is affiliated: Imperium Holdings Limited, Positive Media Solutions Limited, and Positive Jamaica Foundation Limited.

Respondents are the Integrity Commission, as well as directors Craig Beresford and Kevin Stephenson.

In the suit, Mr. Holness outlined that he is seeking to quash the report on the basis that it is an abuse of the power and discretion conferred on the respondents under the Integrity Commission Act and the Corruption Prevention Act.

Mr. Holness is also seeking an order compelling the respondents to examine the 2022 and 2023 statutory declarations as provided by the Integrity Commission Act.

The Prime Minister also wants a declaration that the submission of the Commission’s report to Parliament for tabling was unlawful and/or illegal, having regard to the full terms of Section 54 of the Integrity Commission Act.

Mr. Holness is seeking damages for stigma, negligent investigation and breach of privacy.

He is also seeking aggravated and vindicatory damages.

Read More

Counting of ballots cast in NE St. Ann by-election now underway 

The Supreme Court has been asked to consider granting Prime Minister Andrew Holness leave for judicial review of a report from the Integrity Commission in relation to his statutory declarations.

The suit was filed on Monday by law firm Henlin Gibson Henlin, which represents the Prime Minister.

Mr. Holness is seeking to quash the Integrity Commission’s report, which contains the investigation, findings, and recommendations about his statutory declarations.

That report was tabled in Parliament last month.

The applicants are the Prime Minister, as well as companies with which he is affiliated: Imperium Holdings Limited, Positive Media Solutions Limited, and Positive Jamaica Foundation Limited.

Respondents are the Integrity Commission, as well as directors Craig Beresford and Kevin Stephenson.

In the suit, Mr. Holness outlined that he is seeking to quash the report on the basis that it is an abuse of the power and discretion conferred on the respondents under the Integrity Commission Act and the Corruption Prevention Act.

Mr. Holness is also seeking an order compelling the respondents to examine the 2022 and 2023 statutory declarations as provided by the Integrity Commission Act.

The Prime Minister also wants a declaration that the submission of the Commission’s report to Parliament for tabling was unlawful and/or illegal, having regard to the full terms of Section 54 of the Integrity Commission Act.

Mr. Holness is seeking damages for stigma, negligent investigation and breach of privacy.

He is also seeking aggravated and vindicatory damages.

Read More

Johnson Smith calls on developed countries to do more to prevent arms trafficking

The Supreme Court has been asked to consider granting Prime Minister Andrew Holness leave for judicial review of a report from the Integrity Commission in relation to his statutory declarations.

The suit was filed on Monday by law firm Henlin Gibson Henlin, which represents the Prime Minister.

Mr. Holness is seeking to quash the Integrity Commission’s report, which contains the investigation, findings, and recommendations about his statutory declarations.

That report was tabled in Parliament last month.

The applicants are the Prime Minister, as well as companies with which he is affiliated: Imperium Holdings Limited, Positive Media Solutions Limited, and Positive Jamaica Foundation Limited.

Respondents are the Integrity Commission, as well as directors Craig Beresford and Kevin Stephenson.

In the suit, Mr. Holness outlined that he is seeking to quash the report on the basis that it is an abuse of the power and discretion conferred on the respondents under the Integrity Commission Act and the Corruption Prevention Act.

Mr. Holness is also seeking an order compelling the respondents to examine the 2022 and 2023 statutory declarations as provided by the Integrity Commission Act.

The Prime Minister also wants a declaration that the submission of the Commission’s report to Parliament for tabling was unlawful and/or illegal, having regard to the full terms of Section 54 of the Integrity Commission Act.

Mr. Holness is seeking damages for stigma, negligent investigation and breach of privacy.

He is also seeking aggravated and vindicatory damages.

Read More

Waltham Park residents stage fiery demonstration to call attention to deplorable road condition in their community

The Supreme Court has been asked to consider granting Prime Minister Andrew Holness leave for judicial review of a report from the Integrity Commission in relation to his statutory declarations.

The suit was filed on Monday by law firm Henlin Gibson Henlin, which represents the Prime Minister.

Mr. Holness is seeking to quash the Integrity Commission’s report, which contains the investigation, findings, and recommendations about his statutory declarations.

That report was tabled in Parliament last month.

The applicants are the Prime Minister, as well as companies with which he is affiliated: Imperium Holdings Limited, Positive Media Solutions Limited, and Positive Jamaica Foundation Limited.

Respondents are the Integrity Commission, as well as directors Craig Beresford and Kevin Stephenson.

In the suit, Mr. Holness outlined that he is seeking to quash the report on the basis that it is an abuse of the power and discretion conferred on the respondents under the Integrity Commission Act and the Corruption Prevention Act.

Mr. Holness is also seeking an order compelling the respondents to examine the 2022 and 2023 statutory declarations as provided by the Integrity Commission Act.

The Prime Minister also wants a declaration that the submission of the Commission’s report to Parliament for tabling was unlawful and/or illegal, having regard to the full terms of Section 54 of the Integrity Commission Act.

Mr. Holness is seeking damages for stigma, negligent investigation and breach of privacy.

He is also seeking aggravated and vindicatory damages.

Read More

Three-vehicle crash along Salem main road, St. Ann leaves several injured

The Supreme Court has been asked to consider granting Prime Minister Andrew Holness leave for judicial review of a report from the Integrity Commission in relation to his statutory declarations.

The suit was filed on Monday by law firm Henlin Gibson Henlin, which represents the Prime Minister.

Mr. Holness is seeking to quash the Integrity Commission’s report, which contains the investigation, findings, and recommendations about his statutory declarations.

That report was tabled in Parliament last month.

The applicants are the Prime Minister, as well as companies with which he is affiliated: Imperium Holdings Limited, Positive Media Solutions Limited, and Positive Jamaica Foundation Limited.

Respondents are the Integrity Commission, as well as directors Craig Beresford and Kevin Stephenson.

In the suit, Mr. Holness outlined that he is seeking to quash the report on the basis that it is an abuse of the power and discretion conferred on the respondents under the Integrity Commission Act and the Corruption Prevention Act.

Mr. Holness is also seeking an order compelling the respondents to examine the 2022 and 2023 statutory declarations as provided by the Integrity Commission Act.

The Prime Minister also wants a declaration that the submission of the Commission’s report to Parliament for tabling was unlawful and/or illegal, having regard to the full terms of Section 54 of the Integrity Commission Act.

Mr. Holness is seeking damages for stigma, negligent investigation and breach of privacy.

He is also seeking aggravated and vindicatory damages.

Read More