Opposition demands clarification about Government’s housing programmes

The Opposition is demanding clarification on housing ownership for indigent beneficiaries.

Spokeswoman on Local Government, Natalie Neita Garvey says Local Government Minister Desmond McKenzie should urgently clarify statements made at yesterday’s post-Cabinet press briefing.

He commented on the ownership of houses granted to the registered poor under the Poor Relief Act.

Mr. McKenzie was reacting to the recent Auditor General’s report regarding local authorities’ social housing programme for the indigent.

Mrs. Neita Garvey says the Minister’s assertion that these houses would revert to municipal corporation ownership upon the death of the beneficiary is causing national concern and could be legally misleading.

She states that “the legal status of these homeowners must be clarified, as persons now receiving houses are confused by contradictory statements made by the Minister and their original understanding.”


Mrs. Neita Garvey is also seeking clarification regarding the new Social Housing Programme (NSHP) administered by the Office of the Prime Minister.

She points out that beneficiaries are similar, and some are now anxious about their housing security.

As a result, she is calling for the government to publicly outline the rules governing these housing provisions.

She asserts that the Opposition is firmly against houses being taken away from the elderly, registered poor, indigent individuals or anyone on the paupers’ roll, as this would put surviving family members at risk of homelessness or destitution.

Read More

Government says housing units provided under the NSHP are fully owned by the beneficiaries

The Opposition is demanding clarification on housing ownership for indigent beneficiaries.

Spokeswoman on Local Government, Natalie Neita Garvey says Local Government Minister Desmond McKenzie should urgently clarify statements made at yesterday’s post-Cabinet press briefing.

He commented on the ownership of houses granted to the registered poor under the Poor Relief Act.

Mr. McKenzie was reacting to the recent Auditor General’s report regarding local authorities’ social housing programme for the indigent.

Mrs. Neita Garvey says the Minister’s assertion that these houses would revert to municipal corporation ownership upon the death of the beneficiary is causing national concern and could be legally misleading.

She states that “the legal status of these homeowners must be clarified, as persons now receiving houses are confused by contradictory statements made by the Minister and their original understanding.”


Mrs. Neita Garvey is also seeking clarification regarding the new Social Housing Programme (NSHP) administered by the Office of the Prime Minister.

She points out that beneficiaries are similar, and some are now anxious about their housing security.

As a result, she is calling for the government to publicly outline the rules governing these housing provisions.

She asserts that the Opposition is firmly against houses being taken away from the elderly, registered poor, indigent individuals or anyone on the paupers’ roll, as this would put surviving family members at risk of homelessness or destitution.

Read More

JFJ concerned about the status of JSC tasked with undertaking comprehensive review of the Domestic Violence Act

The Opposition is demanding clarification on housing ownership for indigent beneficiaries.

Spokeswoman on Local Government, Natalie Neita Garvey says Local Government Minister Desmond McKenzie should urgently clarify statements made at yesterday’s post-Cabinet press briefing.

He commented on the ownership of houses granted to the registered poor under the Poor Relief Act.

Mr. McKenzie was reacting to the recent Auditor General’s report regarding local authorities’ social housing programme for the indigent.

Mrs. Neita Garvey says the Minister’s assertion that these houses would revert to municipal corporation ownership upon the death of the beneficiary is causing national concern and could be legally misleading.

She states that “the legal status of these homeowners must be clarified, as persons now receiving houses are confused by contradictory statements made by the Minister and their original understanding.”


Mrs. Neita Garvey is also seeking clarification regarding the new Social Housing Programme (NSHP) administered by the Office of the Prime Minister.

She points out that beneficiaries are similar, and some are now anxious about their housing security.

As a result, she is calling for the government to publicly outline the rules governing these housing provisions.

She asserts that the Opposition is firmly against houses being taken away from the elderly, registered poor, indigent individuals or anyone on the paupers’ roll, as this would put surviving family members at risk of homelessness or destitution.

Read More

Mayor Swaby dismisses allegations of bipartisanship in use of public funds

The Opposition is demanding clarification on housing ownership for indigent beneficiaries.

Spokeswoman on Local Government, Natalie Neita Garvey says Local Government Minister Desmond McKenzie should urgently clarify statements made at yesterday’s post-Cabinet press briefing.

He commented on the ownership of houses granted to the registered poor under the Poor Relief Act.

Mr. McKenzie was reacting to the recent Auditor General’s report regarding local authorities’ social housing programme for the indigent.

Mrs. Neita Garvey says the Minister’s assertion that these houses would revert to municipal corporation ownership upon the death of the beneficiary is causing national concern and could be legally misleading.

She states that “the legal status of these homeowners must be clarified, as persons now receiving houses are confused by contradictory statements made by the Minister and their original understanding.”


Mrs. Neita Garvey is also seeking clarification regarding the new Social Housing Programme (NSHP) administered by the Office of the Prime Minister.

She points out that beneficiaries are similar, and some are now anxious about their housing security.

As a result, she is calling for the government to publicly outline the rules governing these housing provisions.

She asserts that the Opposition is firmly against houses being taken away from the elderly, registered poor, indigent individuals or anyone on the paupers’ roll, as this would put surviving family members at risk of homelessness or destitution.

Read More

JA Ambassador to the US says Jamaicans who overstayed in the US seeking assistance home

The Opposition is demanding clarification on housing ownership for indigent beneficiaries.

Spokeswoman on Local Government, Natalie Neita Garvey says Local Government Minister Desmond McKenzie should urgently clarify statements made at yesterday’s post-Cabinet press briefing.

He commented on the ownership of houses granted to the registered poor under the Poor Relief Act.

Mr. McKenzie was reacting to the recent Auditor General’s report regarding local authorities’ social housing programme for the indigent.

Mrs. Neita Garvey says the Minister’s assertion that these houses would revert to municipal corporation ownership upon the death of the beneficiary is causing national concern and could be legally misleading.

She states that “the legal status of these homeowners must be clarified, as persons now receiving houses are confused by contradictory statements made by the Minister and their original understanding.”


Mrs. Neita Garvey is also seeking clarification regarding the new Social Housing Programme (NSHP) administered by the Office of the Prime Minister.

She points out that beneficiaries are similar, and some are now anxious about their housing security.

As a result, she is calling for the government to publicly outline the rules governing these housing provisions.

She asserts that the Opposition is firmly against houses being taken away from the elderly, registered poor, indigent individuals or anyone on the paupers’ roll, as this would put surviving family members at risk of homelessness or destitution.

Read More

Hampshire and Riversdale residents to benefit from major water supply project

The Opposition is demanding clarification on housing ownership for indigent beneficiaries.

Spokeswoman on Local Government, Natalie Neita Garvey says Local Government Minister Desmond McKenzie should urgently clarify statements made at yesterday’s post-Cabinet press briefing.

He commented on the ownership of houses granted to the registered poor under the Poor Relief Act.

Mr. McKenzie was reacting to the recent Auditor General’s report regarding local authorities’ social housing programme for the indigent.

Mrs. Neita Garvey says the Minister’s assertion that these houses would revert to municipal corporation ownership upon the death of the beneficiary is causing national concern and could be legally misleading.

She states that “the legal status of these homeowners must be clarified, as persons now receiving houses are confused by contradictory statements made by the Minister and their original understanding.”


Mrs. Neita Garvey is also seeking clarification regarding the new Social Housing Programme (NSHP) administered by the Office of the Prime Minister.

She points out that beneficiaries are similar, and some are now anxious about their housing security.

As a result, she is calling for the government to publicly outline the rules governing these housing provisions.

She asserts that the Opposition is firmly against houses being taken away from the elderly, registered poor, indigent individuals or anyone on the paupers’ roll, as this would put surviving family members at risk of homelessness or destitution.

Read More

St.Catherine Chamber of Commerce calls for information on how SOE in St. Catherine North will be implemented

The Opposition is demanding clarification on housing ownership for indigent beneficiaries.

Spokeswoman on Local Government, Natalie Neita Garvey says Local Government Minister Desmond McKenzie should urgently clarify statements made at yesterday’s post-Cabinet press briefing.

He commented on the ownership of houses granted to the registered poor under the Poor Relief Act.

Mr. McKenzie was reacting to the recent Auditor General’s report regarding local authorities’ social housing programme for the indigent.

Mrs. Neita Garvey says the Minister’s assertion that these houses would revert to municipal corporation ownership upon the death of the beneficiary is causing national concern and could be legally misleading.

She states that “the legal status of these homeowners must be clarified, as persons now receiving houses are confused by contradictory statements made by the Minister and their original understanding.”


Mrs. Neita Garvey is also seeking clarification regarding the new Social Housing Programme (NSHP) administered by the Office of the Prime Minister.

She points out that beneficiaries are similar, and some are now anxious about their housing security.

As a result, she is calling for the government to publicly outline the rules governing these housing provisions.

She asserts that the Opposition is firmly against houses being taken away from the elderly, registered poor, indigent individuals or anyone on the paupers’ roll, as this would put surviving family members at risk of homelessness or destitution.

Read More

Westmoreland Custos says JCF made the wrong choice selecting the new denim uniform

The Opposition is demanding clarification on housing ownership for indigent beneficiaries.

Spokeswoman on Local Government, Natalie Neita Garvey says Local Government Minister Desmond McKenzie should urgently clarify statements made at yesterday’s post-Cabinet press briefing.

He commented on the ownership of houses granted to the registered poor under the Poor Relief Act.

Mr. McKenzie was reacting to the recent Auditor General’s report regarding local authorities’ social housing programme for the indigent.

Mrs. Neita Garvey says the Minister’s assertion that these houses would revert to municipal corporation ownership upon the death of the beneficiary is causing national concern and could be legally misleading.

She states that “the legal status of these homeowners must be clarified, as persons now receiving houses are confused by contradictory statements made by the Minister and their original understanding.”


Mrs. Neita Garvey is also seeking clarification regarding the new Social Housing Programme (NSHP) administered by the Office of the Prime Minister.

She points out that beneficiaries are similar, and some are now anxious about their housing security.

As a result, she is calling for the government to publicly outline the rules governing these housing provisions.

She asserts that the Opposition is firmly against houses being taken away from the elderly, registered poor, indigent individuals or anyone on the paupers’ roll, as this would put surviving family members at risk of homelessness or destitution.

Read More

Westmoreland Custos concerned about impact of mass deportation from USA

The Opposition is demanding clarification on housing ownership for indigent beneficiaries.

Spokeswoman on Local Government, Natalie Neita Garvey says Local Government Minister Desmond McKenzie should urgently clarify statements made at yesterday’s post-Cabinet press briefing.

He commented on the ownership of houses granted to the registered poor under the Poor Relief Act.

Mr. McKenzie was reacting to the recent Auditor General’s report regarding local authorities’ social housing programme for the indigent.

Mrs. Neita Garvey says the Minister’s assertion that these houses would revert to municipal corporation ownership upon the death of the beneficiary is causing national concern and could be legally misleading.

She states that “the legal status of these homeowners must be clarified, as persons now receiving houses are confused by contradictory statements made by the Minister and their original understanding.”


Mrs. Neita Garvey is also seeking clarification regarding the new Social Housing Programme (NSHP) administered by the Office of the Prime Minister.

She points out that beneficiaries are similar, and some are now anxious about their housing security.

As a result, she is calling for the government to publicly outline the rules governing these housing provisions.

She asserts that the Opposition is firmly against houses being taken away from the elderly, registered poor, indigent individuals or anyone on the paupers’ roll, as this would put surviving family members at risk of homelessness or destitution.

Read More

Spanish Town schools continue with online classes, despite clearance to resume face to face sessions

The Opposition is demanding clarification on housing ownership for indigent beneficiaries.

Spokeswoman on Local Government, Natalie Neita Garvey says Local Government Minister Desmond McKenzie should urgently clarify statements made at yesterday’s post-Cabinet press briefing.

He commented on the ownership of houses granted to the registered poor under the Poor Relief Act.

Mr. McKenzie was reacting to the recent Auditor General’s report regarding local authorities’ social housing programme for the indigent.

Mrs. Neita Garvey says the Minister’s assertion that these houses would revert to municipal corporation ownership upon the death of the beneficiary is causing national concern and could be legally misleading.

She states that “the legal status of these homeowners must be clarified, as persons now receiving houses are confused by contradictory statements made by the Minister and their original understanding.”


Mrs. Neita Garvey is also seeking clarification regarding the new Social Housing Programme (NSHP) administered by the Office of the Prime Minister.

She points out that beneficiaries are similar, and some are now anxious about their housing security.

As a result, she is calling for the government to publicly outline the rules governing these housing provisions.

She asserts that the Opposition is firmly against houses being taken away from the elderly, registered poor, indigent individuals or anyone on the paupers’ roll, as this would put surviving family members at risk of homelessness or destitution.

Read More